Comments on: Abortion Doctor Murdered

By: admin

admin — Tue, 15 Sep 2009 23:08:25 +0000

You know what’s harsher than the comments? Killing babies.

By: Nikki

Nikki — Thu, 13 Aug 2009 16:12:01 +0000

Your comments are extremely harsh. To compare an abortion doctor to an SS officer is completely naive, and you trivialise the situation by the comparison to a dermatologist removing warts!!!

Always remember that there are more than one ways to kill a person. Abortion is a horrible thing – no woman should have to go through it. However, your comments reflect the ignorance of people that comment on the subject, but their brain cells don’t really function well enough for them to comprehend that abortion is the best – and sometimes only option – in a lot of cases.

Ignorant people like you should not be allowed to rant your views from the rooftop. Your stupid opinions have the potential to harm more people than what you believe that abortion doctor did.

By: Air Force Pilot

Air Force Pilot — Tue, 07 Jul 2009 14:22:53 +0000

I absolutely believe in a woman’s right to choice! If she wants to have unprotected sex with a man, that is entirely up to her. I will even go as far as saying that in a lot of situations, she has the power to make the choice to hang around with guys who would gladly rape her at the right moment and right circumstances. A pregnancy that follows is the end result of her choice, and is as far as her “choosing power” goes. Nature’s law, God’s design of the human body, whatever you want to call it, dictates that a fully healthy sperm contacting a fully healthy egg in the right time will yield a fully healthy baby. As far as rape babies go, what is the difference in a baby conceived by rape and one conceived by an anxious, hoping couple? The answer is the mother’s convenience. There is no different quality of baby. A baby is a baby. Terminating life is just that, terminating life.

By: admin

admin — Tue, 16 Jun 2009 00:10:26 +0000

You’re right that some anti-abortion folks seem to think killing a baby conceived of rape is okay… I don’t understand that. Either it’s a baby or it isn’t. If it is, then how it came to exist is not its fault, so rape is no justification for killing it. If it isn’t a baby, then why should there be any restrictions at all?

I do wonder how many people are really in favor of abortion-in-cases-of-rape and how many are merely willing to accept that as a compromise… which they can later outlaw as well.

Also, the minute Dr. Tiller performs an abortion based on conception-through-rape, your “almost-exhausted-to-death” analogy fails.

By: Annie

Annie — Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:06:38 +0000

Wandom stwanger sez!
Wandom stwanger doesn’t think most anti-abortion protestors believe abortion is killing a baby. (I know SOME who do, and I’m guessing from this post that you do too.) But for the majority I’ve seen, they DON’T believe abortion is killing a baby – if they did, they’d be absolutely opposed to abortions for rape, super-multiple reductions, etc. Most of them believe there are SOME things that make abortion okay – and they aren’t things they would agree would make it okay to kill a born baby. So….
… + Dr Tiller pretty much only ever did abortions on pregnancies where the baby had a terminal illness (or maternal threat to life, underage rape victims who didn’t know they were pregnant…) so it’s more analogous to … I don’t know… an SS worker who put a bullet in the head of the almost-exhausted-to-death inmates?
Wandom stwanger leaves!